| Synopsis: | Establishing that, in an action against an owner of a dog for damages for personal injury or death caused by the dog, evidence that the dog caused the injury or death creates a rebuttable presumption that the owner knew or should have known that the dog had vicious or dangerous propensities; establishing that in an action against a person other than an owner of a dog for specified damages, the common law prior to April 1, 2012, is retained as to the person without regard to the breed or heritage of the dog; etc. |
|---|
| Analysis: | Fiscal and Policy Note (Revised) |
|---|
| All Sponsors: | Delegates Simmons, Anderson, Bromwell, Cardin, K. Kelly, Kramer, Smigiel, and Vallario |
|---|
| Additional Facts: | Bill is an Emergency Bill Cross-filed with: SB0160 Bill File Type: Regular Effective Date(s): Upon Enactment |
|---|
| Committee(s): | |
|---|
| Broad Subject(s): | Civil Actions and Procedures
|
|---|
| Narrow Subject(s): | Animals -see also- Birds; Turtles Civil Actions -see also- Small Claims Condominiums Corporations -see also- Municipal Corps; Public Corps & Inst Court of Appeals Damages Death -see also- Advance Medical Directives; Wrongful Death Emergency Bills Evidence Homeowners Associations Housing -see also- Apartments; Condos; Mobile & Manuf Homes Landlord and Tenant -see also- Eviction; Leases & Rent; etc. Liability -see also- Good Samaritan
|
|---|
| Statutes: | Article - Courts and Judicial Proceedings
(3-1901) |
|---|