File Code: Family Law
- Sponsored By:
-
Delegates Impallaria, Boteler, Costa, Elmore, Kach, J. King, Kipke,
McDonough, Shewell, Smigiel, and Sossi
- Entitled:
-
Family Law - Marriage - Definition and Benefits
Establishing that a specified benefit provider that provides a benefit
plan to a married couple is not required to provide that benefit plan
to a nonmarried couple and may establish a rate for a benefit plan
for a married couple that differs from the rate for a benefit plan for
a nonmarried couple; etc.
House Action
- 2/9
- First Reading Judiciary
- 2/14
- Hearing 3/15 at 1:00 p.m.
- 3/22
- Unfavorable Report by Judiciary
Senate Action
- No Action
Sponsored by:
- Delegate Rick Impallaria, District 7
- Delegate Joseph C. Boteler, III, District 8
- Delegate Robert A. Costa, District 33B
- Delegate D. Page Elmore, District 38A
- Delegate Wade Kach, District 5
- Delegate James S. King, District 33A
- Delegate Nicholaus R. Kipke, District 31
- Delegate Pat McDonough, District 7
- Delegate Tanya Shewell, District 5A
- Delegate Michael D. Smigiel, Sr., District 36
- Delegate Richard A. Sossi, District 36
Bill indexed under the following Subjects:
- Family Law -see also- Adoption; Annulment; Divorce; etc
- Health Insurance -see also- HMOS; Managed Care Organizations
- Insurance -see also- Health Ins; MAIF; Motor Vehicle Ins
- Marriage
- Prices -see also- Consumer Price Index
- Retirement Systems -see also- Mandatory Retirement
- Work, Labor and Employment -see also- Col Barg; Holiday; etc
Bill affects the following Statutes:
- Family Law
- (
2-101 ,
2-101.1
)
- Bill Text (Displayed in PDF Format):
First Reading,
Third Reading, Enrolled
- Fiscal and Policy Note (Displayed in PDF Format):
Available
- Amendments:
None offered
